How Alice Helped a Leading Digital Health Platform Deploy HIPAA-Compliant AI Guardrails for Clinical Use
A digital health platform serving physicians partnered with Alice to deploy a compliant runtime enforcement layer for its AI-powered clinical consultation tool. With HIPAA compliance as the primary requirement, and a user base of medical professionals operating in sensitive clinical environments, the platform needed a vendor that could meet its regulatory obligations while delivering an enforcement architecture precise enough for a professional medical context. Alice provided a HIPAA-compliant guardrails solution, segmented by user authentication status, that allowed the platform to move confidently from proof of concept to full production.

How Alice Helped a Leading Digital Health Platform Deploy HIPAA-Compliant AI Guardrails for Clinical Use
Company Size
Industry
About
Alice delivered a HIPAA-compliant guardrails architecture for a physician-facing AI clinical consultation tool, with enforcement segmented between logged-in and non-logged-in users. The engagement reduced false positives from 4% to 0.6%, expanded adversarial prompt coverage by 96%, and validated prompt injection detection pre-launch - all while maintaining production-grade latency.
Challenge
The platform had developed an AI-powered tool designed to help physicians consult on symptoms and surface relevant clinical information - a professional tool built for professional users, not for general consumers.
The primary challenge was regulatory. Any vendor operating in the healthcare space must meet HIPAA compliance requirements, and that obligation extends to the technology partners providing infrastructure and enforcement. Finding a guardrails vendor that could satisfy those requirements was a prerequisite for moving forward.
Beyond compliance, the platform faced a nuanced enforcement challenge: it needed guardrails that understood clinical context. Physicians routinely engage with sensitive topics (like suicide, self-harm, and adult content) as part of standard patient care. Out-of-the-box guardrails flag this content as unsafe or policy-violating, without the ability to distinguish between a physician documenting a patient case and the same content appearing from an unverified, non-authenticated user. The enforcement layer needed to make that distinction accurately.
A secondary but meaningful concern was latency. Early LLM-based guardrail implementations had produced response delays incompatible with clinical workflow requirements. Any solution needed to be compliant, contextually intelligent, and fast.
How Alice Helped
Alice designed and deployed a HIPAA-compliant enforcement architecture built around the platform's specific deployment context and user structure.
From there, the platform worked with Alice to tune policies and calibrate a second enforcement layer trained on its own data and clinical context. Rather than applying uniform controls across all users, enforcement was segmented by authentication status, reflecting the meaningful difference in risk profile between verified, logged-in clinicians and non-authenticated users accessing the platform.
What made this calibration possible was Alice’s ability to train personalized, per-policy guardrail models on real-world adversarial data, shaped by the platform's specific policies rather than requiring the platform to adapt to the constraints of off-the-shelf guardrails. Clinical topics that are appropriate in a professional medical context could be handled correctly, without over-blocking the interactions the tool was designed to support.
The result was an enforcement layer precise enough for a clinical environment, delivered at Alice's sub-99ms latency, keeping the product responsive for physicians using it in active clinical workflows.
The Results
False positives were reduced significantly (from 4% to 0.6%) without compromising latency or clinical usability. HIPAA compliance requirements were met, and the enforcement architecture held up under the specific demands of a professional medical deployment.
The platform, which had approached production with caution, is now fully live, serving its clinical user base at scale with an enforcement layer built specifically around the policies and context that define its product.
Trusted by security and product teams in the world's most regulated industries
Alice brings years of adversarial intelligence expertise to AI security. We give enterprise teams the coverage that generic guardrails and one-time audits can't match.
Get a demoWhat’s New from Alice
Poisoned Python Bytes & Malicious Caches
Python .pyc caches can execute malicious bytecode while clean source code passes review. Learn how poisoned caches bypass scanners, exploit supply-chain trust, and what teams can do to stay safe.
The Former Google Cloud CISO's Take on AI, Agents, and What Comes Next
There's a lot of noise around AI and security right now, and not many people who can cut through it the way Phil Venables can. He was CISO at Goldman Sachs, then the first CISO for Google Cloud, and he's now a partner at Ballistic Ventures. In this episode, he tells us why attackers scaling up worries him more than the vulnerabilities themselves, what trust even means when an agent is acting in your environment, and why the answer to most of this comes back to the same fundamentals we've leaned on for years.
It Takes AI to Break AI: The Case for AI Red Teaming
As AI systems gain autonomy, organizations need security approaches built specifically for AI behavior. Learn why AI-driven red teaming is becoming a critical defense layer.
Demystifying AI Red Teaming
Your AI passed every check. That doesn't mean it's safe. Learn how to red team AI systems before adversaries find the gaps you missed.
